Same content in all three: every headline, paragraph, list item, testimonial and form field is the copy from the current site. Only the design changes. Pick a direction and the winner gets built out properly.
Both offers, one site
The headline is not sitting on a photo. Type carries the hero; photography is small, sharp and captioned like a magazine. Numbered sections, hairline rules, asymmetric label/content columns. Contact fields are underlines, not boxes.
The most expensive-looking of the three. Best fit if corporate speaking is the priority and the show is a sideline.
Both offers, one site
Tour-poster energy applied to the corporate side too. Anton display caps at 108–116px, full-bleed photo bands under heavy black grades, coloured spotlight gradients, marquee ticker strips.
One system, two moods — amber leads on Speaking, cyan on the show, each page borrowing the other’s colour for its cross-link. Worth weighing: this is loud. It sells the show brilliantly; whether a corporate L&D buyer reads it as credible is the open question.
Two sites, one domain
Two separate sites that only link to each other, with a chooser at the root. Identical skeleton — same 1120px grid, same type ramp, same spacing, same component anatomy. Compare the two site pages section by section and every band lines up.
Only the palette block at the top of each file differs. Each header carries a URL chip and a pill in the other site’s colours; the full-width band above each footer is the crossover. Builds as two folders sharing one stylesheet with two palette overrides.